|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kraw Zin
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
1
   |
Posted - 2014.01.04 22:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
It seams that people are saying that their are now penalty's for stacking mods, I know about the recent shield recharge penalty, but did not know about any others.
Could someone please provide a link or list what the penalty's are for which mods, so we can all know about them.
Thank you, this should help us all out. |
Kraw Zin
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 22:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tectonic Fusion wrote:Kraw Zin wrote:It seams that people are saying that their are now penalty's for stacking mods, I know about the recent shield recharge penalty, but did not know about any others.
Could someone please provide a link or list what the penalty's are for which mods, so we can all know about them.
Thank you, this should help us all out. Read this: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Stacking_penaltiesAlso, it should say which mods have stacking penalties in the game.
This seams to be for EVE and who knows if it translates to Dust.
Does anyone know what the Dust penalty's are for sure? |
Kraw Zin
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 22:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Stacking penalties are not the same thing as the shield extender penalty.
The shield extender penalty is a flat +3% to depleted shield recharge delay per shield extender mod fitted. This is akin to the armor plate penalty, which decreases speed by a static amount based on the tier of armor plate you equipped. It goes STD/ADV/PRO=2%/3%/5%
Stacking penalties are a dynamically increasing set of reductions that increase in strength on a per module basis. If the mod is effected by stacking penalties, it will say so in the module's description. It goes:
First mod: 100%
Second mod: 87%
Third mod: 57%
After that, I don't know the numbers, just suffice to say that the fourth module is too low to be considered effective.
This is the same as the eve link said, are these for Dust?
Pre 1.6 I did not notice any penalties, are their any CCP references to verify this is dust not eve and are they turned on for all mods that list stacking penalties?
|
Kraw Zin
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 23:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Stacking penalties are not the same thing as the shield extender penalty.
The shield extender penalty is a flat +3% to depleted shield recharge delay per shield extender mod fitted. This is akin to the armor plate penalty, which decreases speed by a static amount based on the tier of armor plate you equipped. It goes STD/ADV/PRO=2%/3%/5%
Stacking penalties are a dynamically increasing set of reductions that increase in strength on a per module basis. If the mod is effected by stacking penalties, it will say so in the module's description. It goes:
First mod: 100%
Second mod: 87%
Third mod: 57%
After that, I don't know the numbers, just suffice to say that the fourth module is too low to be considered effective.
Thanks for the explanation on shield 3% penalty and equating it to armor for everyone. |
Kraw Zin
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 23:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Altina McAlterson wrote:Disturbingly Bored wrote:Kraw Zin wrote:This seams to be for EVE and who knows if it translates to Dust.
Does anyone know what the Dust penalty's are for sure? Those numbers have been experimentally verified to be the same for DUST. I'd like to say Ben Hurin did the work on it (he's the work on 95% of everything else), but don't quote me on that. I'm going to agree they have been verified. I haven't done "extensive" work on it but every module I've tested has conformed to the same stacking penalties as EVE.
ok
|
Kraw Zin
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
So to recap for everyone.
If a module says their is a stacking penalty then it is as follows:
First mod: 100%
Second mod: 87%
Third mod: 57%
In addition there are but not cumulative, penalty's for armor and shields.
Any one disagree? of is this it? |
Kraw Zin
Chatelain Rapid Response
Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 20:15:00 -
[7] - Quote
dreth longbow wrote:Everyone else agree?
Thank you for the replies |
|
|
| |
|